I want to modify decision-making or legal custody. How can I do that?
Legal custody, or parental responsibility regarding the making of major decisions for a child, is modifiable pursuant to C.R.S. 14-10-131. The standard to modify legal custody, whether from sole to joint or joint to sole, is not a best interest standard. Rather, statute sets forth various criteria. Specifically, to modify decision-making, one must either show that a physical danger or significant emotional impairment will occur if the existing order regarding legal custody is not changed. Absent extreme circumstances, such as substance abuse or mental health issues, this can be an extremely difficult burden of proof to meet. Statute also allows for modifications of legal custody in instances in which one parent has essentially given up his or role in making decisions. In these instances, which are rare, a parent may have just bowed out of the picture or may have expressly, or by conduct, just allowed the other party to make decisions alone for a significant amount of time. Additionally, a court can modify decision-making in instances in which there has been a change in parenting time that warrants such. For example, if a child has lived with the mother, who has sole legal custody, for years and the father has had only weekend visitation, it would likely be appropriate to modify decision-making to joint if the child comes to reside with father. In this example, it would make no sense for father to have the child residing with him but for the mother to have sole decision-making power or legal custody.
My ex just filed to modify custody last year and is now threatening again. What will the court do?
Pursuant to C.R.S. 14-10-129, a motion to modify visitation that also requests a change in primary residence cannot be filed until 2 years has passed since the disposition of the last similar motion. This means that regardless of the outcome of the prior motion, there is a 2-year waiting period. Therefore, if the parent in this instance files a new motion within those 2 years, the initial step in the response should be to request immediate dismissal of the new motion. The only exception to this is if there are allegations of physical or emotional endangerment, or if the child has been integrated into the moving party’s home, meaning he or she is now residing with that party. Without this two-year rule, a party could burden the court system and the other party with a motion a day. This makes no sense and would certainly not be in the best interest of the children. We are fully abreast of the legal standards for seeking a modification of a Colorado visitation order.
His passion and ferocity kept me going through this long ordeal. When I first came to Plog & Stein it was simply discuss the renegotiation of child support. Little did I know that within 72 hours I would be retaining Steve Plog for a custody battle. His passion and ferocity kept me going through this long ordeal. I have recommended him to my friends and I would recommend him to anyone with who wants honest and effective representation. Carolyn
I recommend Sarah and the attorneys at Plog & Stein to anyone that has these types of family issues and need strong, knowledgeable representation. I am thankful for the job Sarah McCain did for me in my fight with my ex-wife for visitation rights with my daughter. Sarah and the team at Plog & Stein handled my case in an efficient, affordable, and professional manner. Sarah negotiated a new parenting plan as well as acceptable visiting rights and even a favorable modification in my child support. I recommend Sarah and the attorneys at Plog & Stein to anyone that has these types of family issues and need strong, knowledgeable representation. Tom
At the end of the day he was able to produce a settlement that was fair to both parties. I highly recommend Stephen Plog for anyone in need of a top notch domestic relations attorney. After a 27 year marriage, Stephen represented me in a complicated and sometimes bitter divorce with many unique challenges. At the end of the day he was able to produce a settlement that was fair to both parties but limited my alimony payments to only 3 years. He is smart, cuts to the chase, knows the court system in the Denver metropolitan area and can be trusted to get his clients the best possible settlement. Neal
Their service was outstanding, with prompt responses to all of my questions. Sarah McCain and Plog & Stein were wonderful to me during such a difficult time in my life. Their service was outstanding, with prompt responses to all of my questions and creative ideas throughout the proceedings to help things go smoothly. Sarah's compassion, patience, and expertise were especially invaluable to me. I highly recommend them. Sandy
The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation.
This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.
We serve clients throughout the State of Colorado including, but not limited to, those in the following localities: Denver County including Denver; Arapahoe County including Aurora, Centennial, Greenwood Village, and Littleton; Broomfield County; Douglas County including Highlands Ranch, Parker, Castle Rock, and Franktown; Jefferson County including Lakewood, Arvada, Wheat Ridge, and Golden; Adams County including Brighton, Westminster, Northglenn, and Thornton; Boulder County; Elbert County including Elizabeth and Kiowa; El Paso County; Weld County; Larimer County.